Sham surgical procedures for pain intervention result in significant improvements in pain: systematic-review and meta-analysis: Clinical heterogeneity and risk of bias on the placebo effect associated with sham surgeries-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Sham surgical procedures for pain intervention result in significant improvements in pain: systematic-review and meta-analysis: Clinical heterogeneity and risk of bias on the placebo effect associated with sham surgeries

Published:2017-07 Issue: Volume:87 Page:107-108
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Li Xiuxia,Chen Yaolong,Yang Kehu^ORCID

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference7 articles.

1. Sham surgical procedures for pain intervention result in significant improvements in pain: systematic-review and meta-analysis: Metaepidemiologic research requires reporting requirements;Gu;J Clin Epidemiol,2017

2. Chapter 7. Selecting studies and collecting data;Higgins,2008

3. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews;Shea;BMC Med Res Methodol,2007

4. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement;Moher;PLos Med,2009

5. Chapter 8. Assessing risk of bias in included studies;Higgins,2008

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for mental illness in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials;International Journal of Clinical Practice;2021-01-23

2. Sham surgical procedures for pain intervention result in significant improvements in pain: systematic-review and meta-analysis: Metaepidemiologic research requires reporting requirements;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2017-07