Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: A case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: A case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research

Published:2010-06 Issue:12 Volume:70 Page:1896-1903
ISSN:0277-9536
Container-title:Social Science & Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Social Science & Medicine

Author:

De Vries Raymond,Stanczyk Aimee,Wall Ian F.,Uhlmann Rebecca,Damschroder Laura J.,Kim Scott Y.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Health (social science)

Reference32 articles.

1. Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics;Bohman,1997

2. Opinions regarding who should consent to research on behalf of an older adult suffering from dementia;Bravo;The International Journal of Social Research and Practice,2003

3. Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics;Brody;JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association,2005

4. Adapting and combining deliberative designs;Carson,2005

5. Deliberative democratic theory;Chambers;Annual Review of Political Science,2003

Cited by 78 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Stakeholder engagement: the role of facilitators and gender in ‘opening up’ conversations and enabling participation;Australasian Journal of Environmental Management;2024-01-02

2. IMPAACT: IMproving the PArticipAtion of older people in policy decision-making on common health CondiTions – a study protocol;BMJ Open;2024-01

3. Demos ex Machina;Politologische Aufklärung – konstruktivistische Perspektiven;2024

4. Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial;JMIR Formative Research;2023-12-13

5. Patient Values and Preferences for Managing Acute Dental Pain Elicited through Online Deliberation;JDR Clinical & Translational Research;2023-08-04