Reproductive Health Service Preferences And Perceptions of Quality Among Low‐Income Women: Racial, Ethnic and Language Group Differences

Author:

Becker Davida,Tsui Amy O.

Abstract

CONTEXT:  Eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in health care is an important national priority. Despite substantial research documenting such disparities, this topic has received limited attention in the reproductive health field. METHODS:  Logistic regression was used to test for group differences in three service delivery preferences and five service quality perceptions among a nationally representative sample of 1,741 low‐income black, Latina and white women aged 18–34; the data were collected in 1995 and represent the most recent data available for looking at these issues. RESULTS:  English‐speaking Latinas and Spanish‐speaking Latinas were more likely than whites to prefer a female clinician at their visits (odds ratios, 1.8 and 3.6, respectively) and to highly value clinician continuity (1.7 and 2.2). English‐speaking Latinas and blacks were more likely than whites to prefer receiving reproductive health care at a site delivering general health care (1.5 and 1.6). Both groups of Latinas were less likely than whites to give the facility environment or the patient‐centeredness at their most recent reproductive health visit the highest rating (0.3–0.5). Blacks were more likely than whites to report ever having been pressured by a clinician to use contraceptives (2.3). CONCLUSIONS:  Efforts to reduce racial, ethnic and language group differences in clients’ perceptions of reproductive health service quality should focus on improving client‐clinician communication, the service environment and contraceptive counseling. Future research should continue to assess group differences and try to determine their underlying causes.

Publisher

Guttmacher Institute

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3