Abstract
A commonly used technique of herbivore diet analysis consists of grinding ingested material to homogenise
the size of particles, extracting a sub-set of these by sieving, and then reconstructing the diet by counting
the particles referable to various plant species. A set of experiments revealed that this technique is inaccurate
because of variation between species in the number of particles produced per unit dry weight, in the
proportion of these retained by the sieve, and in the proportion that could be identified. Thus the technique
is badly flawed even without the added complication of differential digestibility, which in itself is shown
to be considerable. Certain correction factors derived to cope with these effects are shown to be only
partly successful.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献