Investigating Anthropometric characteristics and Somatotypes in Elite Indian Track & Field Athletes
-
Published:2024-08-13
Issue:2
Volume:4
Page:33-43
-
ISSN:2790-9816
-
Container-title:International Journal of Kinanthropometry
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:ijok
Author:
Kamath Sahana, Adhikari Ragini, Bawari Bhanu, Easow Judy, Kale Uma, Wong Fui Yen, Andrew Pullinger SamuelORCID
Abstract
Introduction: The main aim of this study is to analyze the somatotype and body composition traits of elite-level male track and field competitors in India. Method: Thirty-eight male track and field athletes at the state and national level (Eleven jumpers, four middle-and long-distance runners, nineteen sprinters, and four throwers, took part in the study. Anthropometric measurements were performed for body mass, stature, 7 skinfold sites, 3 girths, and 2 breadths. Somatotypes, body fat %, fat mass and lean body mass for all subjects were also calculated. Results: The pairwise comparison analysis revealed significant differences in the endomorph component for throwers and athletes competing in sprint events (p = 0.000; 95% CI: -2.91 to -0.73), jump events (p = 0.000; 95% CI: -3.25 to -0.94), and middle- or long-distance events (p = 0.002; 95% CI: -3.46 to -0.67). The mesomorph component also revealed significant differences between throwers and athletes competing in sprint events (p = 0.035; 95% CI: -3.27 to -0.09), jump events (p = 0.013; 95% CI: -3.72 to -0.35), and middle- or long-distance events (p = 0.002; 95% CI: -5.00 to -0.92). Significant differences were found in the ectomorph component for jump and throw (p = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.72 to 3.31), for middle/long distance and sprint (p = 0.042; 95% CI: 0.04 to 2.48), for middle/long distance and throw (p = 0.000; 95% CI: 1.37 to 4.52), and for sprint and throw (p = 0.004; 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.91). Significant differences were found in the body fat percentage for jump and throw (p = 0.000; 95% CI: -7.50 to -1.96), for middle/long distance and throw (p = 0.004; 95% CI: -7.97 to -1.27), and for sprint and throw (p = 0.001; 95% CI: -6.86 to -1.64). Conclusion: Throwers were found to be more endomorphic mesomorphs, while middle-and long-distance runners were mesomorphic-ectomorphs, sprinters and jumpers were ectomophic-mesomorphs. Gaining a better understanding of the somatotypes of elite track and field athletes, helps to establish a benchmark for other Indian athletes in the sport, and help coaches improve their training methods.
Reference40 articles.
1. Abraham, G. (2010). Analysis of anthropometry, body composition and performance variables of young Indian athletes in southern region. Indian Journal of Science and technology, 3(12): 1210-1213. https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2010/v3i12.3 2. Adhikari, A., & Chakrabarti, D. (2022). Somatotype and anthropometric characteristics of Indian female rowers. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 2(2): 65-69. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2227 3. Anousaki, E., Stasinaki, A. N., Zaras, N., Terzis, G., Methenitis, S., Arnaoutis, G., & Karampatsos, G. (2018). Rate of force development, lean body mass and throwing performance in female shot-put athletes. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(3): 1699-1703. 4. Armendáriz, M.L.P., Adhikari, R., Bhanu Bawari, B., Varamenti, E., Pullinger, S.A. (2023). Anthropometric characteristic, somatotype, and body composition of Indian Female Combat Sport Athletes: A comparison between Boxers, Judokas, and Wrestlers. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 3(1): 109-117. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk23112 5. Ashwani, D., Dhingra, M., & Kandpal, G. (2019). Road map to Olympics 2024 & 2028 and intervening competitions: an insight to sports schemes for selection and development of potential athletes. International Journal of Yogic, Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 4(1): 384-389.
|
|