Evlilik Çatışma Alanları İndeksi ve Çatışma Çözme Stilleri Envanteri’nin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları

Author:

KARACAN ÖZDEMİR Nurten1ORCID,ERTEN TATLI Cemre2ORCID,ÖZBAY Yaşar3ORCID,AKBAŞ Ufuk3ORCID,HATİPOĞLU SÜMER Zeynep4ORCID,AKÇABOZAN KAYABOL N. Büşra5ORCID,ÇAĞ Pınar6ORCID,AYDIN Gökçen3ORCID,EKER DURMUŞ Esra3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. HASAN KALYONCU UNIVERSITY

3. HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

4. ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ

5. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi

6. Başkent Üniversitesi

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop the Conflict Areas Index (CAI) to identify possible conflict areas that couples experience in their marriages and to develop the Conflict Styles Inventory (CSI) to assess how they deal with these conflicts. Exploratory (N=374) and confirmatory (N=152) factor analysis and test-retest (N=49) examinations were conducted with a sample of 575 married individuals in total. For the first scale, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to examine the construct validity of the CAI. According to the results, a single component giving frequency values for 15 different conflict areas was identified. In the criterion-related validity studies, the scale had a significant, negative, and strong correlation with the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) (r=-.72) and the level of satisfaction with the relationship (r=-.67). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found as .91. For the second scale, the construct validity of the CSI was examined using Exploratory Factor Analysis. The results revealed a three-dimensional structure named destructive, passive, and active conflict resolution styles. In the criterion-related validity studies, it was found significant and positive correlations between destructive (r=.14) and passive (r=.18) conflict resolution styles with CAI scores and a significant and negative correlation between active resolution style with CAI scores. In addition, there were significant and negative correlations between destructive (r=-.15) and passive (r=-.12) conflict resolution styles with the RAS scores and a significant and positive correlation between active conflict resolution style with the RAS scores. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were .88, .87, and .87 for destructive, passive, and active conflict resolution styles, respectively. The correlation values between the scores of the CSI within a 14-day time interval were ⍴=.94, ⍴=.91, and ⍴=.83 for destructive, passive, and active conflict resolution styles, respectively. These results indicated that CAI and CSI have sufficient psychometric properties that can be used to assess conflict areas and conflict resolution styles of married individuals.

Funder

TÜBİTAK

Publisher

Current Approaches in Psychiatry

Subject

Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference82 articles.

1. Abraham PG, Tanya De Bruyne (2000) Conflict management style and marital satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther, 26: 321-334.

2. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı (2011) Türkiye Aile Yapısı Araştırması TAYA 2011, Ankara, Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.

3. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı (2014) Türkiye Boşanma Nedenleri Araştırması. Ankara, Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.

4. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı (2014). Türkiye Aile Yapısı Araştırması Tespitler, Öneriler. Ankara, TC Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.

5. Akbaş U, Karabay E, Yıldırım Seheryeli M, Ayaz A, Demir ÖO (2019) Türkiye ölçme araçları dizininde yer alan açımlayıcı faktör analizi çalışmalarının paralel analiz sonuçları ile karşılaştırılması. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 12:1095-1123.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3