Modeling and Measuring the Effect of Refraction on the Depth Resolution of Confocal Raman Microscopy

Author:

Everall Neil J.1

Affiliation:

1. ICI plc, Wilton Research Centre, P.O. Box 90, Wilton, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, TS90 8JE, UK

Abstract

A simple ray-tracing analysis has been used to predict the effect of refraction at the sample/air interface, on the depth resolution of confocal Raman microscopy. This analysis applies to the “z-scanning”, or “optical sectioning”, approach to obtaining depth profiles, where the laser beam is incident normal to the sample surface, and spectra are recorded sequentially as the focus is moved deeper into the material. It is shown that when a “dry” metallurgical objective (the most common configuration for commercial Raman microscopes) is used, both the position and the depth of focus increase dramatically as the beam is focused deeper into the sample. It quickly becomes impossible to obtain “pure” spectra of thin layers that are buried more than a few micrometers below the air interface. Equations are presented which model the intensity response expected when focusing through a coating into a substrate. The model requires knowledge of the sample refractive index, the numerical aperture, and the laser beam intensity distribution at the limiting aperture, of the objective. Given these values, one can predict the substrate Raman intensity as a function of the nominal focal point within the sample. For a 36 μm coating on a thick substrate, we predict that even for a perfectly sharp interface (<<1 μm), substrate bands rise slowly (over an apparent distance of 10 μm or more), and are strong when the focus is apparently only ∼ 18 μm below the air/coating interface. This prediction was confirmed through experimental observation. The model was also used to analyze literature data that had been interpreted previously as showing interfacial diffusion in polymer laminates. The model correctly reproduced the main features of the observed data without invoking interfacial penetration—the optical aberrations alone accounted for almost all the observed broadening and the fact that the apparent thickness of the buried layer is also distorted. It was concluded that, with the use of this illumination geometry, it is very difficult to detect or quantify interfacial broadening unless it occurs on a very large scale indeed (tens of micrometers). It is concluded that ‘optical sectioning’ cannot be recommended for quantitative depth profiling at significant depths using metallurgical objectives. The optimum practical solution is to cut a cross section and map laterally across the sample, thereby utilizing and maintaining the excellent (lateral) resolution of the Raman microprobe. An alternative solution is to use an immersion objective to minimize refraction at the sample surface.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Spectroscopy,Instrumentation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3