Unpacking the Welfare Technology Solution Discourse: An analysis of society’s perceptions of formal and informal care of older people

Author:

,Nilsson MariaORCID,

Abstract

The overarching aim of this thesis is to examine how the welfare technology solution discourse can provide insights into society’s views of formal and informal care for older people.   The thesis employs a qualitative inductive design based on social constructionism and discourse analysis. The studies illuminated the welfare technology solution discourse from the angle of international research (Study I), Swedish local policy (Study II), local politicians (Study III) and older adults represented by pensioners’ organisations (Study IV). The temporal demarcations were from 2013-2022. The studies made use of the following research methods: scoping review (I), poststructural policy analysis (II), poststructural interview analysis (III) and focus group interviews (IV). The findings were derived from narrative descriptions and interpretations of the empirical data supported by previous empirical, theoretical and grey literature in the field.  The findings highlighted that the welfare technology solution discourse focused on prevention in order to keep older people active and independent and thereby avoid further increases in demands for formal care. Health was positioned as a means to achieve that goal and as an individual responsibility for the older person her/himself. Passive remote monitoring, gaming and digital leisure activities were considered to be part of “good” care, while participation and inclusion were downplayed. Informal carers were positioned as part of the older person’s social sphere, a position that ignores the help, support and/or care they provide to their elder family member or friend on a weekly or even daily basis. The discourse did not include any welfare technology to support or facilitate participation by informal carers. The reviewed empirical literature (I) and policy documents (II) did not take up the issue of health inequalities among older people and their informal carers to any great extent.  The pensioners’ organisations viewed the discourse with concern, cautioning about an increased gap between those digitally included and those excluded in what they perceived as a “harsh and impersonal society”. They positioned informal carers as crucial for the older person’s security and wellbeing.  The thesis challenges the conceptualisation of health in old age as an individual enterprise and argues that interventions using welfare technology for older people need to be targeted towards participation and facilitate reciprocal relationships between all parties involved. Further, informal care needs to be further lifted on the political agenda to illuminate informal carers’ role in the provision of informal care of older people within the modern welfare state in Sweden. 

Publisher

Linnaeus University

Reference248 articles.

1. Ablon, L., Libicki, M. C., & Golay, A. A. (2014). Markets for cybercrime tools and stolen data: Hackers' bazaar. Rand Corporation.

2. Achenbaum, A. W. (2013). Past as prologue: Toward a Global History of Ageing. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Gerontology. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd.

3. Alexopoulou, S., & Åström, J. (2022). How the Responsibility of Digital Support for Older People is Allocated? The Swedish Welfare System at the Crossroads. Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 10(1), 48-76.

4. Alftberg, Å. (2022). Refamilisering och responsibilisering. In Jönson, H. (Ed.), Perspektiv på utsatthet och problem under åldrandet (pp. 190- 205). Lund: Social Work Press.

5. ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Berlin: ALLEA All European Academies. https://www.allea.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-forResearch-Integrity-2017.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3