Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness of Four Balance Measures for Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Author:

Pardasaney Poonam K.1,Latham Nancy K.2,Jette Alan M.3,Wagenaar Robert C.4,Ni Pengsheng5,Slavin Mary D.6,Bean Jonathan F.7

Affiliation:

1. P.K. Pardasaney, PT, DPT, MS, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, and College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

2. N.K. Latham, PT, PhD, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health.

3. A.M. Jette, PT, PhD, FAPTA, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health.

4. R.C. Wagenaar, PhD, Center for Neurorehabilitation, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University.

5. P. Ni, MD, MPH, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health.

6. M.D. Slavin, PT, PhD, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health.

7. J.F. Bean, MD, MPH, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

BackgroundImpaired balance has a significant negative impact on mobility, functional independence, and fall risk in older adults. Although several, well-respected balance measures are currently in use, there is limited evidence regarding the most appropriate measure to assess change in community-dwelling older adults.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare floor and ceiling effects, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness across the following balance measures in community-dwelling elderly people with functional limitations: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment total scale (POMA-T), POMA balance subscale (POMA-B), and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI).DesignRetrospective data from a 16-week exercise trial were used. Secondary analyses were conducted on the total sample and by subgroups of baseline functional limitation or baseline balance scores.MethodsParticipants were 111 community-dwelling older adults 65 years of age or older, with functional limitations. Sensitivity to change was assessed using effect size, standardized response mean, and paired t tests. Responsiveness was assessed using minimally important difference (MID) estimates.ResultsNo floor effects were noted. Ceiling effects were observed on all measures, including in people with moderate to severe functional limitations. The POMA-T, POMA-B, and DGI showed significantly larger ceiling effects compared with the BBS. All measures had low sensitivity to change in total sample analyses. Subgroup analyses revealed significantly better sensitivity to change in people with lower compared with higher baseline balance scores. Although both the total sample and lower baseline balance subgroups showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to 16 weeks on all measures, only the lower balance subgroup showed change scores that consistently exceeded corresponding MID estimates.LimitationsThis study was limited to comparing 4 measures of balance, and anchor-based methods for assessing MID could not be reported.ConclusionsImportant limitations, including ceiling effects and relatively low sensitivity to change and responsiveness, were noted across all balance measures, highlighting their limited utility across the full spectrum of the community-dwelling elderly population. New, more challenging measures are needed for better discrimination of balance ability in community-dwelling elderly people at higher functional levels.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference60 articles.

1. Exercise for improving balance in older people;Howe;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2009

2. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument;Berg;Physiother Can,1989

3. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument;Berg;Can J Public Health,1992

4. Standing balance and function over the course of acute rehabilitation;Bohannon;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1995

5. Quantifying the magnitude of risk for balance impairment on falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Muir;J Clin Epidemiol,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3