A Simple Clinical Scale to Stratify Risk of Recurrent Falls in Community-Dwelling Adults Aged 65 Years and Older

Author:

Buatois Severine1,Perret-Guillaume Christine2,Gueguen Rene3,Miget Patrick4,Vançon Guy5,Perrin Philippe6,Benetos Athanase7

Affiliation:

1. S. Buatois, PhD, is Project Manager, Centre d'Etudes et de Formation sur le Vieillissement and Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital of Nancy.

2. C. Perret-Guillaume, MD, PhD, is Senior Geriatrician, Centre d'Etudes et de Formation sur le Vieillissement and Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital of Nancy.

3. R. Gueguen, PhD, is Senior Statistician, Centre de Médecine Préventive, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.

4. P. Miget, MD, is Geriatrician, Centre de Médecine Préventive, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.

5. G. Vançon, MD, is Rehabilitation Physician, Office d'Hygiène Sociale de Meurthe et Moselle, Centre Florentin, Nancy, France.

6. P. Perrin, MD, PhD, is Otorhinolaryngologist, National Institute for Health and Medical Research, U 954, Faculty of Medicine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France, and Professor, Department of Oto Rhino Laryngology, University Hospital of Nancy.

7. A. Benetos, MD, PhD, is Professor of Medicine and Geriatrics and Director, Centre d'Etudes et de Formation sur le Vieillissement and Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital of Nancy, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Abstract

BackgroundCorrect identification of people at risk for recurrent falls facilitates the establishment of preventive and rehabilitative strategies in older adults.ObjectiveThe purposes of this study were: (1) to develop and validate a simple clinical scale to stratify risk for recurrent falls in community-dwelling elderly people based on easily obtained social and clinical items and (2) to evaluate the added value of 3 clinical balance tests in predicting this risk.DesignThis was a prospective measurement study.MethodsA population of 1,618 community-dwelling people over 65 years of age underwent a health checkup, including performance of 3 clinical balance tests: the One-Leg-Balance Test, the Timed “Up & Go” Test, and the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test. Falls were recorded using a self-administered questionnaire that was completed a mean (SD) of 25±5 months after the visit. Participants were randomly divided into either group A (n=999), which was used to develop the scale, or group B (n=619), which was used to prospectively validate the scale.ResultsLogistic regression analysis identified 4 variables that independently predicted recurrent falls in group A: history of falls, living alone, taking ≥4 medications per day, and female sex. Thereafter, 3 risk categories of recurrent falls (low, moderate, and high) were determined. Predicted probability of recurrent falls increased from 4.1% to 30.1% between the first and third categories. This scale subsequently was validated with great accuracy in group B. Only the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test provided added value in the estimation of risk for recurrent falls, especially for the participants who were at moderate risk, in whom failure on the test (duration of >15 seconds) doubled the risk.LimitationsFalls were assessed only once, and length of follow-up was heterogeneous (18–36 months).ConclusionsClinicians could easily classify older patients in low-, moderate-, or high-risk groups of recurrent falls by using 4 easy-to-obtain items. The Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test provides added value to stratify risk for falls in people at moderate risk.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference38 articles.

1. Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older;Campbell;J Gerontol,1989

2. A risk model for the prediction of recurrent falls in community-dwelling elderly: a prospective cohort study;Stalenhoef;J Clin Epidemiol,2002

3. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community;Tinetti;N Engl J Med,1988

4. Fatal home and leisure accidents in metropolitan France, 2000–2004;Ermanel;Bull Epidémiol Hebd,2007

Cited by 128 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3