Optical evaluation of 3D printed CPC by coupling photogrammetry and ray tracing analysis
-
Published:2022
Issue:4
Volume:20
Page:1282-1292
-
ISSN:1451-4117
-
Container-title:Journal of Applied Engineering Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Appl Eng Science
Author:
Martínez-Manuel Pedro,Valentín-Coronado Luis,Salgado-Transito Iván,Peña-Cruz Manuel,Martell-Chávez Fernando,Carrillo-Baeza Gonzalo,Pineda-Arellano Carlos
Abstract
Manufacturing methods of CPC collectors, regardless the application, have not undergone significant modifications in recent years; the main manufacturing methods are hydraulic press stamping and some other machining methods, which generate errors in geometric curvature and damage to the high-reflectivity film coating, reducing the overall optical efficiency of the CPC. In this work, we propose a method for the fabrication of cylindrical CPCs (widely used in water-heating, disinfection, and wastewater treatment applications), which comprises the use of a 3D printed mold complemented with a structural styrofoam molding. The proposed method presents the advantage of improving the quality of the CPC profile with less damage on the surface of the high reflectivity coating and with a reduction in the quantity of deformations because of its machining processes. To evaluate the effectiveness of the presented method, an experimental-simulation test was carried out based on a photogrammetric technique combined with a Ray tracing Monte Carlo method. The test procedure compared the CPC manufactured with the proposed method (called 3DMCPC) versus one manufactured by a conventional machining technique (referred as CM-CPC). The results obtained show a geometrical mean error value of 1.2 mm for the 3DM-CPC compared to 3.19 mm for the CM-CPC. Optical assessment by ray tracing showed a relative efficiency of 95% for the 3DM-CPC versus 82% of the CM-CPC, both of them compared to the theoretical ideal geometry of a 2D-1 Sun CPC. The benefit could be estimated in a simulation to be 9.4% in the annual performance of a 1000 L CPC thermal energy solar plant.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,General Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Transportation,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference25 articles.
1. Tian, M., Su, Y., Zheng, H., Pei, G., Li, G., Riffat, S. (2018). A review on the recent research progress in the compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) for solar energy applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 82, no. October 2017, 1272-1296. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.050; 2. Jaaz, A. H., Hasan, H. A., Sopian, K., Haji Ruslan, M. H. Bin, Zaidi, S. H. (2017). Design and development of compound parabolic concentrating for photovoltaic solar collector: Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, 1108-1121. DOI:10.1016/J.RSER.2017.03.127; 3. Santos-González, I., García-Valladares, O., Ortega, N., Gómez, V. H. (2017). Numerical Modeling and Experimental Analysis of the Thermal Performance of a Compound Parabolic Concentrator, Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 114. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.100; 4. Mishra, R. K., Garg, V., Tiwari, G. N. (2017). Energy matrices of U-shaped evacuated tubular collector (ETC) integrated with compound parabolic concentrator (CPC). Solar Energy, vol. 153, 531-539. DOI:10.1016/J.SOLENER.2017.06.004; 5. Yin, P., Lv, J., Wang, X., Huang, R. (2021). A spectral splitting planar solar concentrator with a linear compound parabolic lightguide for optical fiber daylighting. Renewable Energy, vol. 179, 778-787. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.100;
|
|