Author:
Zverkov Viktor,Sidorovič Tatjana,Falejev Mihail,Cibikov Nikolaj
Abstract
The uncontrolled, destructive development of civilization has sharply sharpened contemporary global world contradictions, primarily interstate and intrastate relations, society's attitude toward the environment, the violation of the sovereignty of independent states under the pretext of "peacemaking and world security," etc. Experts are alarmed by a growing number of various challenges and threats (geopolitical, food, demographic, climatic, ecological, raw material, energy, etc.) and natural and technogenic emergency situations, the constant improvement of scenarios and methods of terrorist activity, unforeseeable political, socio-economic, ecological and other consequences that hinder the organization and execution of rescue and humanitarian operations, and the sustainable development of countries. Among the possible means of terrorist activity, terrorist acts using "dirty bombs" and biological agents are regarded as the most dangerous due to their medical, biological and socio-psychological consequences.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference17 articles.
1. Chin, F. K. (2007). Scenario of a dirty bomb in an urban environment and acute management of radiation poisoning and injuries. Singapore Medical Journal, 48(10), 950-957;
2. Kankova, J. (2006). Dirty bomb. Kontakt -Journal of nursing and social sciences related to health and illness, 8(1), 128-132;
3. Kuna, P., Hon, Z. & Patocka, J. (2009). How Serious is Threat of Radiological Terrorism. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), 52(3), 85-89;
4. Levett, J. (2007). Radiological terrorism scenarios. Prehospital and disaster medicine, 22(2), 346-347;
5. Ring, J. R. (2004). Radiation risks and dirty bombs. Health physics, 86(2), 42-47;