Transitional Justice and the Constitutional Crisis: The Case of Poland (2015–2019)

Author:

Krotoszyński Michał1

Affiliation:

1. Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Abstract

During the last four years the situation in Poland has been a matter of interest to the worldwide legal community mostly due to the constitutional crisis. Yet, the years 2015–2019 were also a time of a revival of transitional justice measures, such as cleansing the public sphere of communist symbols, remodelling of lustration law, and further reduction of pensions of communist secret service employees and officers. In this paper I argue that these spheres are interconnected and that Poland’s constitutional crisis has a transitional justice dimension. I start with an overview of retrospective instruments dealing with the communist past introduced in the last four years. Next, I turn to the constitutional crisis itself, discussing its possible explanations and transitional justice aspects. In the end I claim that the dramatic constitutional backsliding that Poland has recently experienced can be explained not only as a power grab, but also as a result of the tension between the rule of law and the principle of individual responsibility on one hand – and the resort to collective accountability in an attempt to get what the government sees as justice on the other.

Publisher

Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej - Sekcja Polska IVR

Reference39 articles.

1. Banaszak, B. (2016). The main principles of the reform of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in December 2015: A comparative approach. In A. Szmyt, B. Banaszak (eds.), Transformation of Law Systems in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe in 1989–2015. Liber Amicorum in Honorem Prof. Dr. Dres. H.C. Rainer Arnold (pp. 35–43). Gdańsk: Gdańsk University Press.

2. Banaszkiewicz, B. (2003). Rozrachunek z przeszłością komunistyczną w polskim ustawodawstwie i orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Ius et Lex 1, 441–486.

3. Barsalou, J., Baxter, V. (2007). The Urge to Remember. The Role of Memorials in Social Reconstruction and Transitional Justice. Washington: United States Institute of Peace. Retrieved from:

4. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/srs5.pdf

5. Chmielarz-Grochal, A., Sułkowski J. (2018). Appointment of Judges to the Constitutional Tribunal in 2015 as the Trigger Point for a Deep Constitutional Crisis in Poland. Przegląd Konstytucyjny 2, 91–119.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Uniformed Services Pension Amendment Acts in Poland as Part of State Politics of Memory;Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej;2020-05-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3