Validity of the 8-minute time trial in determining variables for mountain bike cycling training

Author:

Mota Júnior Rômulo José,Oliveira Renata Aparecida Rodrigues de,Moura Anselmo Gomes de,Pussieldi Guilherme de Azambuja,Marins João Carlos Bouzas,Amorim Paulo Roberto dos Santos

Abstract

The 8-minute time trial (TT) is a methodological alternative to the 60-minute TT for evaluating the Functional Threshold Power (FTP) of cyclists, however, studies that tested its validity were not found in the researched literature. Therefore, research aims to assess the validity of the 8-minute TT. The study included 9 trained male cyclists, aged between 25.46 ± 7.49 years, who were assessed on three different days. On the first day, we measured personal data, anthropometrics, ventilatory thresholds and peak oxygen consumption. On the other days, we submitted the volunteers to the 8- and 60-minute TT. We analyzed the agreement between the procedures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and its validity by Bland-Altman. We adopted a significance level of 5%, and we performed all analyses using the SPSS. The results suggest great agreement, especially between the second 8-minute stimulus and the reference test, for FTP (ICC: 0.792, p= 0.016), Wats per kilogram (ICC: 0.952, p< 0.001), Wats per kilogram of lean mass (ICC: 0.912, p= 0.001) and peak oxygen consumption (ICC: 0.882, p= 0.001). In addition, in all these variables, the volunteers were within the mean ± two standard deviations, as verified by the Bland-Altman plots. These results demonstrate the validity of the 8-minute TT, with more robust data being observed by the second stimulus of this protocol.

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

Reference32 articles.

1. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS IN MEDICINE. Diretrizes do ACSM para os testes de esforço e sua prescrição. 10. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Kogan, 2018.

2. ADAMS, R. Revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, v. 45, p. 992,995,1004-1005, abr. 1999.

3. ALLEN, H.; COGAN, A. Training and racing with a power meter. 1. ed. Boulder: VeloPress, 2006.

4. BLAND, J.; ALTMAN, D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, v. 1, n. 8476, p. 307–310, 1986.

5. BORSZCZ, F. K.; TRAMONTIN, A. F.; COSTA, V. P. Is the Functional Threshold Power Interchangeable With the Maximal Lactate Steady State in Trained Cyclists? International journal of sports physiology and performance, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1029–1035, set. 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3