Data Collection in Care Homes for Older Adults: A National Survey in England

Author:

Hanratty BarbaraORCID,Wolters Arne TimonORCID,Towers Ann-MarieORCID,Spilsbury KarenORCID,Meyer JulienneORCID,Killett AnneORCID,Jones Liz,Gordon AdamORCID,Burton Jennifer KirstyORCID,Akdur GizdemORCID,Irvine LisaORCID,Warmoth KrystalORCID,Liddle JenniferORCID,Goodman ClaireORCID

Abstract

Context: In many countries, there is a specification for information that should be collected by care homes. So-called ‘minimum data-sets’ (MDS) are often lengthy, and report on resident health and wellbeing, staff, and facilities. In the UK, the absence of any easily accessible data on the care home population was highlighted at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Care homes faced multiple requests for data from external agencies who had little knowledge of what care homes were already collecting. Objective: This study aimed to identify the range (and method) of data collected by care home organisations, in a country without a mandated MDS. Methods: Online survey of care homes (with/without nursing) in England. Care homes recruited via research and care home networks, social media. Questions covered data content, storage, and views on data sharing, analysed with descriptive statistics. Findings: 273 responses were received, representing over 5,000 care homes. Care homes reported extensive data on the health, care and support needs of individual residents, their preferences, and activities. Clinical measures and tools adopted from health were commonly used, but few collected information on quality-of-life. Care homes reported uses of these data that included monitoring care quality, medication use, staff training needs, budgeting, and marketing. Concerns over privacy and data protection regulations are potential barriers to data sharing. Implications: These findings challenge the notion that incentives or mandates are required to stimulate data collection in care homes. Care home organisations are collecting an extensive range of resident-level information for their own uses. Countries considering introducing social care records or an MDS could start by working with care home organisations to review existing data collection and evaluate the implications of collecting and sharing data. A critical approach to the appropriateness of health-related tools in this setting is overdue.

Publisher

LSE Press

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference17 articles.

1. The Abbey pain scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementia;Int J Palliat Nurs,2004

2. Anon. 2021a. About the LPZ [Online]. Maastricht University. Available from: https://www.lpz-um.eu/en/Home/About [Accessed 01 October 2023].

3. Anon. 2021b. InterRAI Instruments overview [Online]. Available from: https://interrai.org/instruments/ [Accessed 01 October 2023].

4. Anon. 2021c. Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Nursing Homes and Swing Bed Providers [Online]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/NursingHomeQualityInits/NHQIMDS30 [Accessed 01 October 2023].

5. Changes in health and functioning of care home residents over two decades: What can we learn from population-based studies?;Age Ageing,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3