The Effects of Virtual Reality Training on Cognition in Older Adults: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Kantola Mirjami1ORCID,Ilves Outi12ORCID,Honkanen Sari1ORCID,Hakonen Harto3ORCID,Yli-Ikkelä Riku1ORCID,Köyhäjoki Anna4ORCID,Anttila Marjo-Riitta1ORCID,Rintala Aki5ORCID,Korpi Hilkka167ORCID,Sjögren Tuulikki1ORCID,Karvanen Juha8ORCID,Aartolahti Eeva9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

2. Department of Sports and Rehabilitation, South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Savonlinna, Finland

3. Jamk University of Applied Sciences, LIKES, Jyväskylä, Finland

4. Central Ostrobothnia Well-Being Service County “Soite”, Kokkola, Finland

5. Physical Activity and Functional Capacity Research Group, Faculty of Health Care and Social Services, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland

6. Social and Healthcare Unit, Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Vaasa, Finland

7. Well-being and Culture Unit, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland

8. Faculty of Mathematics and Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

9. Institute of Rehabilitation, Jamk University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression was to examine the effects of virtual reality–based training on global cognition and executive function compared with conventional training or information-based treatment in older adults, regardless of cognitive level. A systematic literature search was conducted using four databases. A total of 31 randomized controlled trials were identified. Pooled effect sizes were calculated, the risk of bias was assessed, and evidence was graded. The primary analyses showed a small but statistically significant effect of virtual reality–based training compared with control on global cognition (Hedges’ g 0.42, 95% confidence interval [0.17, 0.68], I2 = 70.1%, n = 876, 20 randomized controlled trials, low evidence) and executive function (Hedges’ g 0.35, 95% confidence interval [0.06, 0.65], I2 = 68.4%, n = 810, 16 randomized controlled trials, very low evidence). Meta-regression yielded inconclusive results. Virtual reality–based training may be more effective than control in improving cognition in older adults; however, more high-quality studies are needed.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3