Research Protocol Adaptations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Process Evaluation

Author:

Wingood Mariana12ORCID,Linsky Amy M.345ORCID,Harris Rebekah12ORCID,Bamonti Patricia67ORCID,Moye Jennifer178ORCID,Bean Jonathan F.129ORCID

Affiliation:

1. New England Geriatric Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA

2. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

3. Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA

4. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA

5. Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

6. Research & Development, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

8. Department of Psychiatry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

9. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

In general, COVID-19-related adaptations that transitioned in-person assessments and interventions to a virtual format were not routinely evaluated. We aimed to conduct a process evaluation to examine the impact of COVID-19-related adaptations on a behavior change intervention designed to increase exercise adherence among Veterans with mobility difficulty. We used secondary data from a nonrandomized study to complete a process evaluation examining the intervention’s reach, recruitment, fidelity, dose delivered by physical therapists, and the dose received by the 14 participating Veterans. The physical therapist delivered 95% (133/140) of the study’s 10 sessions. Sessions with the lowest delivery dose included Sessions 1 and 10 (86%; n = 12/14). The elements with the lowest dose received included using an exercise journal and developing a postintervention plan (86%; n = 12/14). Our COVID-19 adaptations allowed us to provide our intervention to the majority (67%) of eligible participants without a negative impact on fidelity, dose delivered, or dose received.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference29 articles.

1. What really works in intervention? Using fidelity measures to support optimal outcomes;An, M.,2020

2. Red, yellow, and green light changes: Adaptations to extension health promotion programs;Balis, L.E.,2021

3. The development of a coaching protocol to enhance self-efficacy within outpatient physical therapy;Bamonti, P.M.,2022

4. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change;Bandura, A.,1977

5. Key factors associated with adherence to physical exercise in patients with chronic diseases and older adults: An umbrella review;Collado-Mateo, D.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3