Epidemiological analysis of anaplasmosis in cattle from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
-
Published:2023-11
Issue:
Volume:
Page:2287-2292
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Badshah Farhad1, Ullah Kalim2, Kamal Mustafa1ORCID, Rafiq Naseem1ORCID, Usman Tahir3, Ríos-Escalante Patricio R. De los4ORCID, Said Mourad Ben5ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan. 2. Department of Zoology, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat-26000, Pakistan. 3. College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Abdul Wali Khan University, 23200 Mardan, Pakistan. 4. Universidad Católica de Temuco Facultad de Recursos Naturales Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Químicas Casilla 15-D Temuco, Chile; Nucleo de Estudios Ambientales, UCTemuco, Chile. 5. Department of Basic Sciences, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Manouba 2010, Tunisia; Laboratory of Microbiology, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Manouba 2010, Tunisia.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Anaplasmosis, a tick-borne disease affecting livestock caused by the bacteria Anaplasma, poses a global concern. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence, spatiotemporal variation, and associated risk factors of anaplasmosis in cattle from the Bannu and Lakki Marwat districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Materials and Methods: This study used 197 cattle exhibiting clinical symptoms of anaplasmosis in natural settings. Microscopic examination was used to estimate the prevalence. Potential risk factors, such as sampling regions and months, gender, breed, and age were studied.
Results: The study revealed an overall anaplasmosis prevalence of 19.79%. Bannu district exhibited a higher occurrence at 22.10%, compared to Lakki Marwat district at 17.64%. Young cattle (<2 years) demonstrated a notably higher incidence of anaplasmosis (26.78%) compared to adults (>5 years), which had a prevalence of 12.35% (p < 0.05). Female cattle (22.36%) were more susceptible than male cattle (11.11%). Prevalence peaked in June (45.71%) and was lowest in February (3.57%). Crossbred cattle had a higher prevalence (23.52%) than purebred cattle (11.47%).
Conclusion: Anaplasmosis can be effectively controlled using a comprehensive approach encompassing selective breeding for resilience, targeted care of young calves and females, effective tick control during warmer months, consistent use of insecticides, and proactive risk factor management. Raising awareness among farmers through diverse channels, including media, is pivotal to bolster tick-borne disease management strategies.
Keywords: anaplasmosis, biotic risk factors, cattle, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, spatiotemporal variation.
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference30 articles.
1. Nitture, B., Kasaralikar, V.R., Halmandge, S.C., Ravindra, B.G., Kulkarni, S. and Patil, N.A. (2020) Clinico, haemato-biochemical changes and therapeutic management of anaplasmosis. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 9(3): 1440–1449. 2. Kolo, A. (2023) Anaplasma species in Africa-a century of discovery: A review on molecular epidemiology, genetic diversity, and control. Pathogens, 12(5): 702. 3. Diniz, P.P.V.P. and de Aguiar, D.M. (2022) Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis: An update. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim., 52(6): 1225–1266. 4. Cossu, C.A., Collins, N.E., Oosthuizen, M.C., Menandro, M.L., Bhoora, R.V., Vorster, I., Cassini, R., Stoltsz, H., Quan, M. and van Heerden, H. (2023) Distribution and prevalence of anaplasmataceae, rickettsiaceae and coxiellaceae in African ticks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microorganisms, 11(3): 714. 5. Salinas-Estrella, E., Amaro-Estrada, I., Cobaxin-Cárdenas, M.E., de la Torre, J.F.P. and Rodríguez, S.D. (2022) Bovine anaplasmosis: Will there ever be an almighty effective vaccine? Front. Vet. Sci., 9: 946545.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|