Improved Breast 2D SWE Algorithm to Eliminate False-Negative Cases

Abstract

Objectives Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (SWE) has been limited in breast lesion characterization due to false-negative results from artifacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate an updated Food and Drug Administration–approved breast 2D-SWE algorithm and compare with the standard algorithm (SA). Materials and Methods This prospective, single-center study was approved by our local institutional review board and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. From April 25, 2019 to May 2, 2022, raw shear wave data were saved on patients having screening or diagnostic breast ultrasound on a Siemens Sequoia US. After removing duplicate images and those without biopsy diagnosis or stability over 2 years, there were 298 patients with 394 lesions with biopsy-proven pathology or >2-year follow-up. Raw data were processed using the SA and a new algorithm (NA). Five-millimeter regions of interest were placed in the highest stiffness in the lesion or adjacent 3 mm on the SA. Stiffness values (shear wave speed, max) in this location from both algorithms were recorded. Statistics were calculated for comparing the 2 algorithms. Results The mean patient age was 56.3 ± 16.1 years (range, 21–93 years). The mean benign lesion size was 10.7 ± 8.0 mm (range, 2–46 mm), whereas the mean malignant lesion size was 14.9 ± 7.8 mm (range, 4–36 mm). There were 201 benign (>2-year follow-up) and 193 biopsied lesions (65 benign; 128 malignant). The mean maximum stiffness for benign lesions was 2.37 m/s (SD 1.26 m/s) for SA and 3.51 m/s (SD 2.05 m/s) for NA. For malignant lesions, the mean maximum stiffness was 4.73 m/s (SD, 1.71 m/s) for SA and 8.45 m/s (SD, 1.42 m/s) for NA. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 SA and 0.95 NA when using the optimal cutoff value. Using a threshold value of 5.0 m/s for NA and comparing to SA, the sensitivity increased from 0.45 to 1.00 and the specificity decreased from 0.94 to 0.81; the positive predictive value was 0.72, the negative predictive value was 1.00, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.00. Conclusions Using a new breast SWE algorithm significantly improves the sensitivity of the technique with a small decrease in specificity, virtually eliminating the “soft” cancer artifact. The new 2D-SWE algorithm significantly increases the sensitivity and negative predictive value in characterizing breast lesions as benign or malignant and allows for downgrading all BI-RADS 4 lesions.