Quality and Safety Indicators in Anesthesia

Author:

Haller Guy1,Stoelwinder Johannes2,Myles Paul S.3,McNeil John4

Affiliation:

1. Consultant, Department of Anesthesia, Pharmacology and Intensive Care/Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Geneva University Hospitals. Visiting Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Alfred Hospital. Honorary Research Associate, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University.

2. Professorial Fellow, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Head of the Health Services Management and Research Unit, Monash University.

3. Director and Head of Research, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital. Associate Professor, Departments of Anesthesia, and Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University.

4. Professor and Chairman, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Clinical Research Excellence, Canberra, Australia.

Abstract

Clinical indicators are increasingly developed and promoted by professional organizations, governmental agencies, and quality initiatives as measures of quality and performance. To clarify the number, characteristics, and validity of indicators available for anesthesia care, the authors performed a systematic review. They identified 108 anesthetic clinical indicators, of which 53 related also to surgical or postoperative ward care. Most were process (42%) or outcome (57%) measures assessing the safety and effectiveness of patient care. To identify possible quality issues, most clinical indicators were used as part of interhospital comparison or professional peer-review processes. For 60% of the clinical indicators identified, validity relied on expert opinion. The level of scientific evidence on which prescriptive indicators ("how things should be done") were based was high (1a-1b) for 38% and low (4-5) for 62% of indicators. Additional efforts should be placed into the development and validation of anesthesia-specific quality indicators.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference82 articles.

Cited by 108 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3