Abstract
Abstract
Ensuring students are prepared for the Physician Assistant National Certification Exam (PANCE) is an institutional priority for all physician assistant programs. While many factors predicting PANCE performance have been investigated, exploration and discussions of interventions to improve PANCE performance are limited. Repeated exposure to board-style questions has been shown to improve board scores in similar populations. Currently, existing question banks cannot be used to generate secure summative examinations, and commercial question banks may perpetuate inequitable access among physician assistant (PA) students. To address this issue, the University of Oklahoma Physician Assistant program used a community of practice model to create a mock board exam writing group. The group was created to facilitate the development of 9 PANCE-style exams to bolster students' clinical preparedness and PANCE performance. These writing groups also provided a platform for junior faculty to receive feedback and guidance from senior colleagues, thus facilitating and promoting mentorship. This article highlights the potential benefits of mock board exam writing groups in PA education and provides insight into their development and implementation.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference16 articles.
1. The predictive strength of the end of curriculum exam;Massey;J Physician Assist Educ.,2022
2. Reliability and validity of national end of rotation examinations: an update;Gietzen;J Physician Assist Educ,2018
3. Early predictors of students at risk of poor PANCE performance;Butina;J Physician Assist Educ.,2017
4. Board review course as intervention: impact on PANCE performance;Mirly;J Physician Assist Educ.,2017
5. The cost of board examination and preparation: an overlooked factor in medical student debt;Bhatnagar;Cureus,2019