Efficacy and safety of double- versus single-balloon retrograde enteroscopy

Abstract

Introduction Data on the safety and efficacy of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are conflicting. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of retrograde DBE to SBE. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent retrograde DBE or SBE at a large tertiary referral center from 2008 to December 2018. Outcomes assessed included technical success, diagnostic yield, therapeutics, depth of insertion, and procedural duration. Results A total of 523 (403 DBE, 120 SBE) patients underwent retrograde enteroscopy during the study period. The mean age was 59.4 ± 17.24 and 59.57 ± 16.94 years in DBE and SBE groups, respectively. There was no difference in technical success (91.0% vs. 92.5%, P = 0.85), diagnostic yield (40.9% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.95), and therapeutics (17.1% vs. 19.1%, P = 0.61) between DBE and SBE. Compared to SBE, DBE had significantly shorter mean procedure time (26.5 ± 34.5 min vs. 34.8 ± 29.4 min, P = 0.01) and higher maximal depth of insertion from ileocecal valve (108.1 ± 84.1 cm vs. 73.3 ± 63.4 cm, P = 0.001). Safety events were rare and similar in both groups. Conclusion Retrograde DBE is associated with a significantly higher depth of insertion and shorter procedural duration, but similar diagnostic yield and technical success compared to SBE.