Affiliation:
1. US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
3. Department of Defense Biotechnology High Performance Computing Software Applications Institute, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, US Army Medical Research and Development Command, Fort Detrick, Maryland
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background: Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of death on the battlefield. This study aims to assess the ability of an artificial intelligence triage algorithm to automatically analyze vital-sign data and stratify hemorrhage risk in trauma patients. Methods: Here, we developed the APPRAISE–Hemorrhage Risk Index (HRI) algorithm, which uses three routinely measured vital signs (heart rate and diastolic and systolic blood pressures) to identify trauma patients at greatest risk of hemorrhage. The algorithm preprocesses the vital signs to discard unreliable data, analyzes reliable data using an artificial intelligence–based linear regression model, and stratifies hemorrhage risk into low (HRI:I), average (HRI:II), and high (HRI:III). Results: To train and test the algorithm, we used 540 h of continuous vital-sign data collected from 1,659 trauma patients in prehospital and hospital (i.e., emergency department) settings. We defined hemorrhage cases (n = 198) as those patients who received ≥1 unit of packed red blood cells within 24 h of hospital admission and had documented hemorrhagic injuries. The APPRAISE-HRI stratification yielded a hemorrhage likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.28 (0.13–0.43) for HRI:I, 1.00 (0.85–1.15) for HRI:II, and 5.75 (3.57–7.93) for HRI:III, suggesting that patients categorized in the low-risk (high-risk) category were at least 3-fold less (more) likely to have hemorrhage than those in the average trauma population. We obtained similar results in a cross-validation analysis. Conclusions: The APPRAISE-HRI algorithm provides a new capability to evaluate routine vital signs and alert medics to specific casualties who have the highest risk of hemorrhage, to optimize decision-making for triage, treatment, and evacuation.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Blood transfusion management in the severely bleeding military patient;Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2018
2. An analysis of prehospital deaths: who can we save?;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2014
3. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care;J Trauma,2011
4. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2012
5. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment;J Trauma,1995
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献