The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Location and Delivery of Palliative Radiotherapy

Author:

Heng Anthony K.1ORCID,Gooley Ted2,Lo Simon S.3,Yang Jonathan T.4,Gillespie Erin F.3,Halasz Lia M.3,Tseng Yolanda D.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Washington School of Medicine

2. Translational Science and Therapeutics

3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington and Radiation Oncology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

4. Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, NY

Abstract

Objectives: Among patients that underwent palliative RT (pRT) at a single institution, we evaluated whether differences exist across race and ethnicity in location of pRT consultation and delivery of pRT. Methods: This retrospective study included cancer patients aged 18 years or older who received pRT between 10/2021 and 10/2022. Logistic regression models were used to examine univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) associations between race and pRT consult in the inpatient (vs. outpatient) setting. A subset analysis of quality metrics for pRT delivery was limited to patients who had outpatient consults for pain. Results: Four hundred forty patients underwent 548 pRT consults (104 inpatient and 444 outpatient) followed by a course of pRT. Most patients were male (58.2%), White non-Hispanic (WNH) (72.6%), and English-speaking (92.9%). On MVA adjusting for histology, language, and insurance type, consults for Black/African American (BAA) patients had 2.92 higher odds of being performed in the inpatient setting compared with consults for WNH patients (95% CI: 1.28-6.70, P=0.011), although the global P-value was P=0.217. Among 290 outpatient consults for painful lesions, no differences in time to pRT start (global P=0.84), number of prescribed fractions of RT (global P=0.94), or new prescriptions for opioids (global P=0.69) were noted by race and ethnicity. Conclusions: In this study, BAA race was associated with the location of pRT consultation, but no discernible differences were noted regarding the outpatient delivery of pRT for pain. These findings support the importance of inpatient pRT programs to ensure equitable access. More research is needed to understand barriers to outpatient consult.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3