Recommendations for a core outcome measurement set for clinical trials in whiplash associated disorders

Author:

Sterling Michele12ORCID,Andersen Tonny3,Carroll Linda4,Connelly Luke256,Côté Pierre789,Curatolo Michele1011,Grant Genevieve212,Jull Gwendolen13,Kasch Helge141516,Ravn Sophie Lykkegaard317,MacDermid Joy1819,Malmström Eva-Maj20,Rebbeck Trudy221,Söderlund Anne22,Treleaven Julia13,Walton David M.18,Westergren Hans20

Affiliation:

1. Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia

2. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia

3. Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark

4. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

5. The University of Queensland Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, Sir Llew Edwards Building, St Lucia, Australia

6. Departmento di Sociologia e Diritto Dell’Economia, The University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

7. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada

8. Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Oshawa, ON, Canada

9. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

10. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States

11. Clinical Learning, Evidence and Research (CLEAR) Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Harborview Injury Preventions and Research Center (HIPRC), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States

12. Faculty of Law, Australian Centre for Justice Innovation (ACJI), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

13. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

14. Research Unit, Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark, Viborg, Denmark

15. Department of Neurology, Regional Hospital of Viborg, Viborg, Denmark

16. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

17. Specialized Hospital for Polio and Accident Victims, Rødovre, Denmark

18. School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON Canada

19. Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, ON Canada

20. Department of Pain Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

21. Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

22. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of treatments for whiplash associated disorders (WAD) hinders effective data pooling and conclusions about treatment effectiveness. A multidisciplinary International Steering Committee recently recommended 6 core outcome domains: Physical Functioning, Perceived Recovery, Work and Social Functioning, Psychological Functioning, Quality of Life and Pain. This study aimed to reach consensus and recommend a core outcome set (COS) representing each of the 6 domains. Forty-three patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were identified for Physical Functioning, 2 for perceived recovery, 37 for psychological functioning, 17 for quality of life, and 2 for pain intensity. They were appraised in 5 systematic reviews following COSMIN methodology. No PROMs of Work and Social Functioning in WAD were identified. No PROMs had undergone evaluation of content validity in patients with WAD, but some had moderate-to-high-quality evidence for sufficient internal structure. Based on these results, the International Steering Committee reached 100% consensus to recommend the following COS: Neck Disability Index or Whiplash Disability Questionnaire (Physical Functioning), the Global Rating of Change Scale (Perceived Recovery), one of the Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, or Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (Psychological Functioning), EQ-5D-3L or SF-6D (Quality of Life), numeric pain rating scale or visual analogue scale (Pain), and single-item questions pertaining to current work status and percent of usual work (Work and Social Functioning). These recommendations reflect the current status of research of PROMs of the 6 core outcome domains and may be modified as evidence grows.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3