Do emergency medicine health care workers rate triage level of chest pain differently based upon appearance in simulated patients?

Author:

Coisy Fabien1,Olivier Guillaume2,Ageron François-Xavier3,Guillermou Hugo4,Roussel Mélanie5,Balen Frédéric6,Grau-Mercier Laura1,Bobbia Xavier7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, CHU de Nimes, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

4. IDESP, University of Montpellier and INSERM, Montpellier, France

5. Emergency Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France

6. Emergency Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France

7. Montpellier University, UR UM 103 (IMAGINE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France

Abstract

Background and importance There seems to be evidence of gender and ethnic bias in the early management of acute coronary syndrome. However, whether these differences are related to less severe severity assessment or to less intensive management despite the same severity assessment has not yet been established. Objective To show whether viewing an image with characters of different gender appearance or ethnic background changes the prioritization decision in the emergency triage area. Methods The responders were offered a standardized clinical case in an emergency triage area. The associated image was randomized among eight standardized images of people presenting with chest pain and differing in gender and ethnic appearance (White, Black, North African and southeast Asian appearance). Outcome measures and analysis Each person was asked to respond to a single clinical case, in which the priority level [from 1 (requiring immediate treatment) to 5 (able to wait up to 2 h)] was assessed visually. Priority classes 1 and 2 for vital emergencies and classes 3–5 for nonvital emergencies were grouped together for analysis. Results Among the 1563 respondents [mean age, 36 ± 10 years; 867 (55%) women], 777 (50%) were emergency physicians, 180 (11%) emergency medicine residents and 606 (39%) nurses. The priority levels for all responses were 1–5 : 180 (11%), 686 (44%), 539 (34%), 131 (9%) and 27 (2%). There was a higher reported priority in male compared to female [62% vs. 49%, difference 13% (95% confidence interval; CI 8–18%)]. Compared to White people, there was a lower reported priority for Black simulated patients [47% vs. 58%, difference −11% (95% CI −18% to −4%)] but not people of southeast Asian [55% vs. 58%, difference −3% (95% CI −10–5%)] and North African [61% vs. 58%, difference 3% (95% CI −4–10%)] appearance. Conclusion In this study, the visualization of simulated patients with different characteristics modified the prioritization decision. Compared to White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive emergency treatment. The same was true for women compared with men.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Emergency Medicine

Reference38 articles.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3