Remimazolam dosing for gastroscopy: a randomized noninferiority trial

Author:

Zhu Huichen1,Su Zhongxue,Zhou Hongmei2,Lu Jian2,Wang Xiangrui3,Ji Zhonghua3,Chen Shibiao4,Wang Xiuhong4,Yao Ming5,Lu Yaping5,Yu Weifeng1,Su Diansan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

2. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China

3. 3. Department of Pain Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

4. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

5. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China

Abstract

Background Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, may provide adequate sedation for endoscopy while causing less cardiovascular or respiratory disturbance than propofol. Although fixed-dose administration is suggested, body weight affects the volume of the central chamber and thus affects the sedation depth that can be achieved by the first dose. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different doses of remimazolam and propofol by body weight for sedation during gastroscopy. Methods This multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled noninferiority trial recruited patients from five centers, between March 2021 and July 2022. A total of 1883 patients scheduled to undergo gastroscopy were randomized to 0.15 mg/kg remimazolam, 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam, or 1.5 mg/kg propofol group. The noninferiority margin was set to 5%. The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation. Adverse events were recorded to evaluate safety. Results The sedation success rate of the 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam group was not inferior to that of the 1.5 mg/kg propofol group (98.7% vs. 99.4%, risk difference, −0.64%; 97.5% confidence interval (CI), −2.2% to 0.7%, meeting criteria for noninferiority). However, the sedation success rate of the 0.15 mg/kg remimazolam group was 88.5%, and that of the 1.5 mg/kg propofol group was 99.4% (risk difference, −10.8%; 97.5% CI, −14.0% to −8.0%), demonstrating inferiority. Simultaneously, the overall adverse events rate of remimazolam was lower than that of propofol, and the incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, subclinical respiratory depression, and hypoxia in the remimazolam groups was significantly lower than that in the propofol group. Conclusions This trial established noninferior sedation success rate of remimazolam (0.2 mg/kg but not 0.15 mg/kg) compared with propofol (1.5 mg/kg), with a superior safety profile.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3