Frontalis Muscle Flap Versus Maximal Anterior Levator Resection as First Option for Patients With Severe Congenital Ptosis

Author:

Medel Ramón1,Molina Salvador1,Vasquez Luz Maria1,Visa Josep2,Wert Ana2,Wolley-Dod Charlotte2

Affiliation:

1. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Department

2. Pediatric Ophthalmology Department, Instituto de Microcirugia Ocular, Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare 2 surgical techniques (frontalis flap versus maximal anterior levator resection) as first surgical options for the treatment of congenital ptosis with poor levator function in patients younger than 2 years of age with a follow up of 10 years. Methods: A retrospective study of 58 patients (71 eyelids) with severe ptosis and poor levator function who underwent frontalis muscle flap (FMF = 47) or maximal anterior levator resection (ALR = 24) for correction of their ptosis. Eyelid measurements were taken at baseline, 1, 5, and 10 years after surgery. The presence of complications, need for reoperations, and palpebral contour were evaluated. Results: Most patients in both groups required only one surgical procedure with a stable average margin-reflex distance 1 over the 10-year follow-up period in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 techniques in achieving an adequate palpebral height after one single procedure. Eleven eyelids treated with FMF (23%) and 12 treated with ALR (50%) needed a reoperation, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 techniques. Five ALR patients (21%) and 6 FMF patients (13%) had alterations of eyelid contour. Pop-eyelid and eyelash ptosis were observed in 8% of patients operated with FMF. Conclusion: Good functional and aesthetic results were obtained with both surgical techniques. FMF required fewer reoperations compared with maximal ALR, offering a better long-term result without residual ptosis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3