Affiliation:
1. All authors are affiliated with the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
Abstract
BACKGROUND
It is recommended to excise adnexal neoplasms with standard local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), although many occur on high-risk sites such as the head and neck (H&N) and exhibit subclinical extension. Minimal evidence exists on the efficacy of standard excisions for these tumors.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the rate of positive surgical margins after standard excision of adnexal tumors.
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study of cutaneous adnexal malignancies from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019.
RESULTS
The authors identified a total of 4,402 cases treated with standard excision. Tumors on the H&N were approximately twice as likely as those on the trunk and extremities (T&E) to be excised with positive margins (odds ratio 2.146, p < .001), with the highest estimated rate for eccrine adenocarcinoma (12.1%, SE: 2.3%). The subtype with the highest positive margin rate on the T&E was microcystic adnexal carcinoma (8.0%, SE: 2.9). Positive margins were associated with poorer overall survival on multivariable survival analysis (hazard ratio 1.299, p = .015).
CONCLUSION
The authors present subtype- and site-specific positive margin rates for adnexal tumors treated with standard excision, which suggest that tumors on the H&N and some T&E subtypes, should be considered for MMS.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Dermatology,General Medicine,Surgery