Evaluating the Internet as a Source of Information for Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of Websites' Content, Insights Into Engagement, and Access

Author:

Karamitros Georgios12,Antonios-Vlachos Georgios1,Kok Charlene3,Goulas Sofoklis4567,Lamaris Gregory A.8

Affiliation:

1. Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece;

2. Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece;

3. Imperial College, Medical School, London, UK;

4. Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia;

5. World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia;

6. Aletheia Research Institution, Palo Alto, California;

7. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, California;

8. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Internet has become the primary information source for patients, with most turning to online resources before seeking medical advice. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of online information on hidradenitis suppurativa available to patients. METHODS The authors performed an Internet search using the search terms “hidradenitis suppurativa,” “hidradenitis suppurativa treatment,” “hidradenitis suppurativa surgery,” and “acne inversa.” They identified the initial 100 websites from Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Websites were evaluated based on the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients instrument. RESULTS Of the 300 websites, 95 (31.7%) were incorporated after accounting for the exclusion criteria: duplicate entries, websites not pertinent to the subject matter, websites inaccessible due to location restrictions or necessitating user accounts for access, websites in languages other than English, and websites originating from scientific publications directed at a scientific audience rather than the general population. Ensuring Quality Information for Patients scores ranged from 5 to 30/36, with a median of 17. CONCLUSION This analysis unveils a diverse array of websites that could confound patients navigating toward high-caliber resources. These barriers may hinder the access to top-tier online patient information and magnify disparities in referral rates, patient engagement, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3