Author:
Roden-Foreman Jacob Watkin,Rapier Nakia R.,Foreman Michael L.,Zagel Alicia L.,Sexton Kevin W.,Beck William C.,McGraw Constance,Coniglio Raymond A.,Blackmore Abigail R.,Holzmacher Jeremy,Sarani Babak,Hess Joseph C.,Greenwell Cynthia,Adams Charles A.,Lueckel Stephanie N.,Weaver Melinda,Agrawal Vaidehi,Amos Joseph D.,Workman Cheryl F.,Milia David J.,Bertelson Annette,Dorlac Warren,Warne Maria J.,Cull John,Lyell Cassie A.,Regner Justin L.,McGonigal Michael D.,Flohr Stephanie D.,Steen Sara,Nance Michael L.,Campbell Marie,Putty Bradley,Sherar Danielle,Schroeppel Thomas J.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Patients' trauma burdens are a combination of anatomic damage, physiologic derangement, and the resultant depletion of reserve. Typically, Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15 defines major anatomic injury and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) <7.84 defines major physiologic derangement, but there is no standard definition for reserve. The Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) identifies severely depleted reserves (NFTI+) with emergent interventions and/or early mortality. We hypothesized NFTI would have stronger associations with outcomes and better model fit than ISS and RTS.
METHODS
Thirty-eight adult and pediatric U.S. trauma centers submitted data for 88,488 encounters. Mixed models tested ISS greater than 15, RTS less than 7.84, and NFTI's associations with complications, survivors' discharge to continuing care, and survivors' length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS
The NFTI had stronger associations with complications and LOS than ISS and RTS (odds ratios [99.5% confidence interval]: NFTI = 9.44 [8.46–10.53]; ISS = 5.94 [5.36–6.60], RTS = 4.79 [4.29–5.34]; LOS incidence rate ratios (99.5% confidence interval): NFTI = 3.15 [3.08–3.22], ISS = 2.87 [2.80–2.94], RTS = 2.37 [2.30–2.45]). NFTI was more strongly associated with continuing care discharge but not significantly more than ISS (relative risk [99.5% confidence interval]: NFTI = 2.59 [2.52–2.66], ISS = 2.51 [2.44–2.59], RTS = 2.37 [2.28–2.46]). Cross-validation revealed that in all cases NFTI's model provided a much better fit than ISS greater than 15 or RTS less than 7.84.
CONCLUSION
In this multicenter study, NFTI had better model fit and stronger associations with the outcomes than ISS and RTS. By determining depletion of reserve via resource consumption, NFTI+ may be a better definition of major trauma than the standard definitions of ISS greater than 15 and RTS less than 7.84. Using NFTI may improve retrospective triage monitoring and statistical risk adjustments.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic, level IV.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)