A Surgical Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Reveals Complex Relationships Between Race/Ethnicity, Insurance Type, and Neighborhood Deprivation

Author:

Jacobs Michael A.1,Schmidt Susanne2,Hall Daniel E.345,Stitzenberg Karyn B.6,Kao Lillian S.7,Brimhall Bradley B.89,Wang Chen-Pin2,Manuel Laura S.10,Su Hoah-Der11,Silverstein Jonathan C.11,Shireman Paula K.112

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

2. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

3. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA

4. Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

5. Wolff Center, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA

6. Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

7. Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX

8. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

9. University Health, San Antonio, TX

10. UT Health Physicians Business Intelligence and Data Analytics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

11. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

12. Departments of Primary Care & Rural Medicine and Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, Texas A&M Health, Bryan, TX

Abstract

Objective: Develop an ordinal Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) for surgical outcomes to examine complex associations of Social Determinants of Health. Background: Studies focused on single or binary composite outcomes may not detect health disparities. Methods: Three health care system cohort study using NSQIP (2013–2019) linked with EHR and risk-adjusted for frailty, preoperative acute serious conditions (PASC), case status and operative stress assessing associations of multilevel Social Determinants of Health of race/ethnicity, insurance type (Private 13,957; Medicare 15,198; Medicaid 2835; Uninsured 2963) and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) on DOOR and the binary Textbook Outcomes (TO). Results: Patients living in highly deprived neighborhoods (ADI>85) had higher odds of PASC [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.13, CI=1.02–1.25, P<0.001] and urgent/emergent cases (aOR=1.23, CI=1.16–1.31, P<0.001). Increased odds of higher/less desirable DOOR scores were associated with patients identifying as Black versus White and on Medicare, Medicaid or Uninsured versus Private insurance. Patients with ADI>85 had lower odds of TO (aOR=0.91, CI=0.85–0.97, P=0.006) until adjusting for insurance. In contrast, patients with ADI>85 had increased odds of higher DOOR (aOR=1.07, CI=1.01–1.14, P<0.021) after adjusting for insurance but similar odds after adjusting for PASC and urgent/emergent cases. Conclusions: DOOR revealed complex interactions between race/ethnicity, insurance type and neighborhood deprivation. ADI>85 was associated with higher odds of worse DOOR outcomes while TO failed to capture the effect of ADI. Our results suggest that presentation acuity is a critical determinant of worse outcomes in patients in highly deprived neighborhoods and without insurance. Including risk adjustment for living in deprived neighborhoods and urgent/emergent surgeries could improve the accuracy of quality metrics.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3