Early Versus Delayed Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury

Author:

Romijn Anne-Sophie C.12,Rastogi Vinamr34,Proaño-Zamudio Jefferson A.1,Argandykov Dias1,Marcaccio Christina L.3,Giannakopoulos Georgios F.2,Kaafarani Haytham M.A.1,Jongkind Vincent56,Bloemers Frank W.2,Verhagen Hence J.M.4,Schermerhorn Marc L.3,Saillant Noelle N.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

2. Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

4. Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

5. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

6. Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Microcirculation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objective: We examined early (≤24 h) versus delayed (>24 h) thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI), taking the aortic injury severity into consideration. Background: Current trauma surgery guidelines recommend delayed TEVAR following BTAI. However, this recommendation was based on small studies, and specifics regarding recommendation strategies based on aortic injury grades are lacking. Methods: Patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2016 and 2019 were included and then stratified into 2 groups (early: ≤24 h vs. delayed: >24 h). In-hospital outcomes were compared after creating 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts, matching for demographics, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, additional procedures, and aortic injury severity based on the acute aortic syndrome (AAS) classification. Results: Overall, 1339 patients were included, of whom 1054(79%) underwent early TEVAR. Compared with the delayed group, the early group had significantly less severe head injuries (early vs delayed; 25% vs 32%; P=0.014), fewer early interventions for AAS grade 1 occurred, and AAS grade 3 aortic injuries often were intervened upon within 24 hours (grade 1: 28% vs 47%; grade 3: 49% vs 23%; P<0.001). After matching, the final sample included 548 matched patients. Compared with the delayed group, the early group had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs 4.4%, relative risk: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1–4.4; P=0.028), alongside a shorter length of hospital stay (5.0 vs 10 days; P=0.028), a shorter intensive care unit length of stay (4.0 vs 11 days; P<0.001) and fewer days on the ventilator (4.0 vs 6.5 days; P=0.036). Furthermore, regardless of the higher risk of acute kidney injury in the delayed group (3.3% vs 7.7%, relative risk: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.92; P=0.029), no other differences in in-hospital complications were observed between the early and delayed group. Conclusion: In this propensity score-matched analysis, delayed TEVAR was associated with lower mortality risk, even after adjusting for aortic injury grade.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3