Comparison between washed microbiota transplantation and infliximab: Medical cost during long-term management in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Author:

Zhang Sheng12,Huang Yihao12,Lu Gaochen12,Zhang Zulun12,Wang Yun12,Liu Yujie12,Wang Weihong12,Li Qianqian12,Li Pan12,Wen Quan12,Cui Bota12,Zhang Faming1234

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiota Medicine & Medical Center for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

2. Key Lab of Holistic Integrative Enterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

3. Department of Microbiotherapy, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

4. National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xi’an, China

Abstract

Background: Both infliximab (IFX) and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have shown the efficacy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there has no head-to-head study on the cost-value of the such treatments on IBD. This study aimed to compare the medical costs using IFX and the new method of FMT (washed microbiota transplantation [WMT]) in the long-term management for IBD under the current health economic condition in China. Methods: Patients with IBD who underwent initial WMT via upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, mid-gut tube, or colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing at a university hospital between April 2013 and August 2021 and achieved the long-term sustainment with WMT or WMT combined with mesalazine until August 2022 were recruited in the real-world. The costs and hospitalizations were analyzed among two therapies mentioned above and IFX standard therapy. The charge of WMT was stable in the long term at our center, and the charge of IFX came from virtual statistics publicized by China Healthcare Security. Results: Sixty eligible patients with IBD were included in the study. The long-term costs of patients using WMT monotherapy annually or per hospitalization were lower than those on WMT combined with mesalazine, respectively (p < 0.001, respectively). The cumulative costs of IFX at the time of 0.52 and 0.85 years exceeded that of the above WMT, respectively (p < 0.001, respectively). Besides, patients on WMT monotherapy paid 51.1 k CNY annually in the nonsustain phase but cut down the costs by 7.2 k CNY and duration of hospitalization by 5.1 days per hospitalization when reaching the goal of sustainment. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that WMT could dramatically reduce the cost and duration of hospitalizations in the long-term sustainment in the current Chinese IBD cohort. Compared with IFX, WMT could be a good way for the patients with IBD achieving long-term sustainment and saving medical costs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Ulcerative colitis.;Ungaro;Lancet,2017

2. Crohn’s disease.;Torres;Lancet,2017

3. Multiomics to elucidate inflammatory bowel disease risk factors and pathways.;Agrawal;Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2022

4. Environmental triggers in IBD: a review of progress and evidence.;Ananthakrishnan;Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2018

5. Biologic agents for IBD: practical insights.;Danese;Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2015

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3