The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of large pheochromocytomas (>6 cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review

Author:

Gan Lijian1,Peng Lei2,Meng Chunyang1,Zheng Lei1,Zeng Zhiqiang34,Ge Si34,Wang Zuoping1,Li Kangsen1,Li Yunxiang1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University)

2. Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University Medical School, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China

3. Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University

4. Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) under different routes for the treatment of large pheochromocytomas (PCCs) is unknown. Materials and methods: This meta-analysis and systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) Guidelines. Three databases were systematically searched, including Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science. The time frame of the search was set from the creation of the database to October 2022. Perioperative outcomes were divided into two groups according to tumor size: SMALL group (≤6 cm in diameter), LARGE group (>6 cm in diameter). Results: Eight studies including 600 patients were included. In the LA group, complications was comparable in both groups (SMALL group and LARGE group), and the LARGE group had longer operative time [OT weighted mean difference (WMD)=32.55; 95% CI: 11.17, 53.92; P<0.01], length of stay (LOS WMD=0.82; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.44; P<0.05), more estimated blood loss (EBL WMD=85.26; 95% CI: 20.71, 149.82; P<0.05), hypertension [odds ratio (OR)=3.99; 95% CI: 1.84, 8.65; P<0.01], hypotension (OR=1.84; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.05; P<0.05), and conversion (OR=5.60; 95% CI: 1.56, 20.13; P<0.01). In the transabdominal LA group, OT, LOS, EBL, complications, hypertension, and hypotension were the same in both groups. In the retroperitoneal LA group, complications and hypotension were the same in both groups, while the LARGE group had longer OT (WMD=52.07; 95% CI: 26.95, 77.20; P<0.01), LOS (WMD=0.51; 95% CI: 0.00, 1.01; P<0.05), more EBL (WMD=92.99; 95% CI: 27.70, 158.28; P<0.01) and higher rates of hypertension (OR=6.03; 95% CI: 1.95, 18.61; P<0.01). Conclusions: LA remains a safe and effective approach for large PCC. Transabdominal LA is superior to retroperitoneal LA.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Reference26 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3