A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Bupivacaine with Ropivacaine for Labor Analgesia

Author:

Halpern Stephen H.1,Breen Terrance W.2,Campbell David C.3,Muir Holly A.2,Kronberg Jean1,Nunn Robert4,Fick Gordon H.5

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Centre, Women's College Campus, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.

3. Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesia, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia, IWK-Grace Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

5. Professor, Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

Background A meta-analysis of studies comparing high doses of bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor pain found a higher incidence of forceps deliveries, motor block, and poorer neonatal outcome with bupivacaine. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in these outcomes when a low concentration of patient-controlled epidural bupivacaine combined with fentanyl is compared with ropivacaine combined with fentanyl. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, including term, nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. For the initiation of analgesia, patients were randomized to receive either 15 ml bupivacaine, 0.1%, or 15 ml ropivacaine, 0.1%, each with 5 microg/ml fentanyl. Analgesia was maintained with patient-controlled analgesia with either local anesthetic, 0.08%, with 2 microg/ml fentanyl. The primary outcome was the incidence of operative delivery. We also examined other obstetric, neonatal, and analgesic outcomes. Results There was no difference in the incidence of operative delivery between the two groups (148 of 276 bupivacaine recipients vs. 135 of 279 ropivacaine recipients; P = 0.25) or any obstetric or neonatal outcome. The incidence of motor block was significantly increased in the bupivacaine group compared with the ropivacaine group at 6 h (47 of 93 vs. 29 of 93, respectively; P = 0.006) and 10 h (29 of 47 vs. 16 of 41, respectively; P = 0.03) after injection. Satisfaction with mobility was higher with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine (mean +/- SD: 76 +/- 23 vs. 72 +/- 23, respectively; P = 0.013). Satisfaction for analgesia at delivery was higher for bupivacaine than for ropivacaine (mean +/- SD: 71 +/- 25 vs. 66 +/- 26, respectively; P = 0.037). Conclusions There was no difference in the incidence of operative delivery or neonatal outcome among nulliparous patients who received low concentrations of bupivacaine or ropivacaine for labor analgesia.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference29 articles.

Cited by 59 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Myopathies and the Parturient;Obstetric Anesthesia and Uncommon Disorders;2024-02-01

2. Optimization of programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume for different concentrations of ropivacaine in labor analgesia: a biased coin up-and-down sequential allocation trial;BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth;2022-07-25

3. Comparison of Ropivacaine-Fentanyl with Bupivacaine-Fentanyl for Labour Epidural Analgesia;The Open Anesthesiology Journal;2020-12-15

4. Analgesia ostetrica;EMC - Anestesia-Rianimazione;2020-11

5. Analgesia obstétrica;EMC - Anestesia-Reanimación;2020-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3