External validation of 18F-FDG PET-based radiomic models on identification of residual oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Author:

Valkema Maria J.1,Beukinga Roelof J.2,Chatterjee Avishek3,Woodruff Henry C.34,van Klaveren David5,Noordzij Walter2,Valkema Roelf6,Bennink Roel J.7,Roef Mark J.8,Schreurs Wendy9,Doukas Michail10,Lagarde Sjoerd M.1,Wijnhoven Bas P.L.1,Lambin Philippe34,Plukker John T.M.11,van Lanschot J. Jan B.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam

2. Medical Imaging Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen

3. Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- School for Oncology, Maastricht University

4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht

5. Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre

6. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam

7. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam

8. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven

9. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen

10. Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam

11. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objectives Detection of residual oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is important to guide treatment decisions regarding standard oesophagectomy or active surveillance. The aim was to validate previously developed 18F-FDG PET-based radiomic models to detect residual local tumour and to repeat model development (i.e. ‘model extension’) in case of poor generalisability. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study in patients collected from a prospective multicentre study in four Dutch institutes. Patients underwent nCRT followed by oesophagectomy between 2013 and 2019. Outcome was tumour regression grade (TRG) 1 (0% tumour) versus TRG 2-3-4 (≥1% tumour). Scans were acquired according to standardised protocols. Discrimination and calibration were assessed for the published models with optimism-corrected AUCs >0.77. For model extension, the development and external validation cohorts were combined. Results Baseline characteristics of the 189 patients included [median age 66 years (interquartile range 60–71), 158/189 male (84%), 40/189 TRG 1 (21%) and 149/189 (79%) TRG 2-3-4] were comparable to the development cohort. The model including cT stage plus the feature ‘sum entropy’ had best discriminative performance in external validation (AUC 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.73), with a calibration slope and intercept of 0.16 and 0.48 respectively. An extended bootstrapped LASSO model yielded an AUC of 0.65 for TRG 2-3-4 detection. Conclusion The high predictive performance of the published radiomic models could not be replicated. The extended model had moderate discriminative ability. The investigated radiomic models appeared inaccurate to detect local residual oesophageal tumour and cannot be used as an adjunct tool for clinical decision-making in patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3