Preliminary Validation of the Pain Relief Motivation Scales

Author:

Letzen Janelle E.1,Hunt Carly A.1,Webb Caroline2,Vetter Maria3,Finan Patrick H.14,Karoly Paul5,Mun Chung Jung16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

2. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

3. Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN

4. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA

5. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe

6. Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ

Abstract

Objectives: Pain typically prompts individuals to seek relief. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Pain Relief Motivation Scales, applying revised “reinforcement sensitivity theory” to measure the neuropsychological systems underlying motivation for pain relief. We hypothesized a 6-factor structure based on previous work, including one Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) factor, one Fight-Flight-Freeze System factor, and 4 Behavioral Activation System (BAS) factors. Methods: Items were generated by adapting the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire for relevance to pain relief. Adults with chronic pain were recruited internationally to participate in online survey batteries at baseline and 1 week later in 2021. We randomly split the sample to conduct exploratory factor analysis (n = 253) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 253). Psychometric properties were estimated using the full sample (N = 506). Results: Parallel analysis revealed that a 5-factor structure best fits the data (21 items): (1) hopelessness about pain relief (BIS), (2) hesitancy for engaging in pain treatments (BIS), (3) persistence in engaging in pain treatments (BAS), (4) relief reactivity (BAS), and (5) risky relief seeking (BAS). Acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.68 to 0.80) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.71 to 0.88) were observed. Construct validity varied from weak to moderate (r = 0.02 to 0.45). Conclusion: As the first attempt to create an instrument measuring neuropsychological systems underlying motivation for pain relief, the findings show that additional work is needed to refine theory and psychometric rigor in this area. Cautiously, the results suggest that a BIS-BAS model, with minimal Fight-Flight-Freeze System contributions, might be useful for understanding the motivation for relief.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference39 articles.

1. A common neurobiology for pain and pleasure;Leknes;Nat Rev Neurosci,2008

2. Emotional and motivational pain processing: current state of knowledge and perspectives in translational research;Becker;Pain Res Manag,2018

3. Common brain mechanisms of chronic pain and addiction;Elman;Neuron,2016

4. An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system;Gray;Neuropsychol Anxiety,2000

5. The neural correlates of reinforcement sensitivity theory: a systematic review of the (f) MRI literature;Standen;Psychol Neurosci,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3