The Activity Management Inventory for Pain (AMI-P)

Author:

Racine Mélanie1,Jensen Mark P.2,Cane Douglas3,Moulin Dwight E.1,Vlaeyen Johan W.S.45,Nielson Warren R.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

3. Pain Management Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

4. Research Group Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

5. Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

6. Department of Psychology, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Objectives: Activity management is an important treatment component in chronic pain programs. However, there are shortcomings in measures of this construct, leading to inconsistencies in research findings. Here, we describe the development of the Activity Management Inventory for Pain (AMI-P). Methods: The AMI-P was developed by a group of international researchers with extensive expertise both in chronic pain and activity management. The initial evaluation of the AMI-P items included two studies that were both conducted in Canadian tertiary pain care centers. Results: The resulting 20-item measure has three behavior scales (Rest, Alternating Activity, Planned Activity), and four goal scales (Feel Less Pain, Get More Done, Complete the Task, Save Energy). The behavior scales evidenced marginal to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and a moderate positive association with an existing pacing measure. The Rest and Alternating Activity scales were associated with greater pain interference, the Alternating Activity and Planned Activity scales were associated with less satisfaction with social roles, and the Planned Activity scale was associated with fewer depressive symptoms. The Alternating Activity scale increased significantly from pre- to post-treatment. All goal scales were positively associated with all behavior scales. The Feel Less Pain goal scale was positively associated with measures of avoidance and pain interference, while the Get More Done goal scale was negatively associated with measures of depressive symptoms and overdoing. Discussion: The findings support the reliability and validity of the AMI-P scales, while also highlighting the complexity and multidimensional aspects of activity management.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3