Paravertebral Nerve Block for Procedural Pain in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Author:

Kang Min-Seok1,Son In-Seok2,Kim Tae-Hoon3,Lee Suk-Ha3,You Ki-Han4,Lee Woo-Myung4,Hyun Jin-Tak4,Park Hyun-Jin4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jeju University Medical Center, Jeju, Republic of Korea

3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical College, Seoul

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to unidimensionally measure procedural pain at each percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) stage and evaluate the effectiveness of paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) in reducing procedural pain. Methods: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was conducted on 66 patients who underwent PVP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (fluoroscopic-guided PVNB; 5 cm3 of 0.75% ropivacaine on each side) and group B (local anesthesia). To investigate procedural pain associated with PVP, the visual analog scale score was assessed at each surgical stage: before the incision (stage 1), transpedicular approach (stage 2), and polymethylmethacrylate cement injection (stage 3). After the procedure, patients were asked about their surgical experience and satisfaction using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. Periprocedural complications were also recorded. Results: A total of 63 patients (78.65 y of age) were finally enrolled: 30 from group A and 33 from group B. In both groups, a significant ≥2-point increase in procedural pain was observed during PVP compared with that during stage 1 (P < 0.001). In stages 2 and 3, the pain intensity was significantly lower in group A (P < 0.001). Upon discharge, the visual analog scale score improved in all groups; however, the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale score was significantly higher in group A (P < 0.001). There was no difference in periprocedural complications between the two groups (P = 0.743). Conclusion: PVP causes significant procedural pain, and PVNB is a potentially effective modality for enhancing patient satisfaction and reducing procedural pain.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference31 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3