Deep and Superficial Debridement Techniques in Lower Extremity Split-thickness Skin Grafting

Author:

Rohrich Rachel N.1,Li Karen R.12,Lava Christian X.12,Alahmadi Sami2,Stanton Henry L.2,Kim Victoria H.2,Spoer Daisy L.2,Evans Karen K.1,Steinberg John S.3,Attinger Christopher E.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.

2. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.

3. Department of Podiatric Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.

Abstract

Background: Patients with nonhealing lower extremity (LE) wounds often require a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) for closure. Nonviable tissue must be debrided before STSG inset. Our study aimed to compare differences in debridement depth on STSG outcomes. Methods: Chronic, atraumatic LE wounds receiving STSG from December 2014 to December 2022 at a single institution were reviewed. Demographics, wound characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were collected. Superficially debrided wounds were compared with wounds receiving deep debridement (DD), defined by debriding to the level of white tissue underlying the granulation tissue. Subanalysis was performed on wounds that had a negative and positive postdebridement culture. Primary outcome was graft failure. Results: Overall, 244 wounds in 168 patients were identified. In total, 158 (64.8%) wounds were superficially debrided and 86 (35.3%) received DD. The cohort had a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3]. Diabetes (56.6%) and peripheral artery disease (36.9%) were prevalent. The only statically significant demographic difference between groups was congestive heart failure (SD: 14.9% versus DD: 3.0%, P = 0.017). Wound size, depth, and all microbiology results were similar between groups. Postoperatively, the DD group demonstrated significantly less graft failure (10.5% versus 22.2%, P = 0.023). In a multivariate regression, DD was independently associated with lower odds of graft failure (OR: 0.0; CI, 0.0–0.8; P = 0.034). Sub-analysis of graft failure supported this finding in culture-positive wounds (DD: 7.6% versus DD: 22.1%, P = 0.018) but not in culture-negative wounds (13.6% versus 22.2%, P = 0.507). Conclusions: The DD technique demonstrates improved outcomes in chronic, culture-positive LE wounds receiving STSG.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference48 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3