Comparison Between Patient and Plastic Surgeon Aesthetic Analysis in Rhinoplasty Consultation

Abstract

Background: The surgeon’s aesthetic analysis of the nose is based on scientific measures of its proportions and dimensions. Because the primary aim of rhinoplasty is targeted at the patient’s satisfaction with self-image, patients’ perception and satisfaction are of paramount importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgeon versus patient nasal aesthetic analysis. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 57 primary rhinoplasty consultations during the period June and September 2017 at the Plastic Surgery Clinic in King Fahad Hospital-Hofuf. The surgeon and the patients were handed identical questionnaires before the consultations. The questionnaire has 27 components regarding the nasal appearance. Results: The surgeon’s and the patients’ perceptions regarding reliability was assessed by Cohen’s Kappa and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. There was moderate agreement with the overall appearance of the nose (κ = 0.2–0.39). The most agreed-upon components were “dorsal hump” (κ = 0.6, P = 0.001) and “tip drops down” (κ = 0.41, P = 0.002). The columella and the suitability of the front part of the nose had the largest disagreement (κ = -0.06 and κ = −0.09, respectively). The level of agreement among most of the questionnaires’ components was slight or nonexistent (κ = 0.004–0.39). Conclusions: The surgeon and patients have a minimum agreement regarding the view of nasal appearance, mostly with the suitability of the front part and the columella. The parts of the nose agreed upon the most were “dorsal hump” and “tip drops down”. Exploring the differences between patient and surgeon aesthetic analysis of the nose will aid in addressing the discrepancies and improving surgical outcome and satisfaction.