A Phase-III Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial of Letibotulinum Toxin A for the Improvement of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Wrinkles in China

Author:

Xie Yun1,Yang Xiumin2,Liang Hong3,Bo Hongliang4,Lu Jianyun5,Guo Qing6,Li Li7,Moon Hyoung-jin8,Li Qingfeng6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated Medical College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

2. Department of Dermatovenereology, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China

3. Department of Dermatology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

4. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

5. Department of Dermatology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China

6. Department of Dermatology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

7. Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

8. Hugel, Inc., Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background: Letibotulinum toxin A has an established efficacy and safety profile for aesthetic treatment of glabellar wrinkles. This study was conducted to demonstrate the noninferiority of letibotulinum toxin A versus onabotulinum toxin A in improving the appearance of moderate-to-severe glabellar wrinkles in Chinese patients. Methods: This phase-III multicenter, randomized, parallel positive control, double-blinded study compared the efficacy and safety of letibotulinum toxin A and onabotulinum toxin A. Eligible participants were randomized 3:1 to receive 20 U of letibotulinum toxin A or onabotulinum toxin A and were observed for 16 weeks postinjection. The primary endpoint was noninferiority in the proportion of study participants receiving a score of 0 or 1 for glabellar wrinkles on a four-point photographic evaluation scale, as assessed by an institution evaluator at maximum frown at week 4. Secondary endpoints included assessments at rest, photographic assessment of efficacy, and subjective self-assessment of the study participants. Results: The proportion of participants (N = 500) receiving a score of 0 or 1 at maximum frown by the institution evaluator at week 4 was 88.49% for letibotulinum toxin A and 87.39% for onabotulinum toxin A (difference, 1.10%; 95% confidence interval, −5.02 to 8.82; P = 0.7469). No significant differences were observed between the treatments for secondary efficacy or safety endpoints. Participants’ self-assessment and satisfaction tended to be higher for letibotulinum toxin A than onabotulinum toxin A. Conclusion: Letibotulinum toxin A is noninferior to onabotulinum toxin A in improving the appearance of moderate-to-severe glabellar wrinkles in Chinese patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery,General Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3