Construct Validity Testing of the Provider Co-Management Index to Measure Shared Care in Provider Dyads

Author:

Norful Allison A.1ORCID,Dierkes Andrew2ORCID,de Jacq Krystyna3ORCID,Brewer Katherine C.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY

2. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

3. SUNY Polytechnic Institute, New York, NY

4. Towson University, Towson, MD

Abstract

Abstract Background Co-management encompasses the dyadic process between two health care providers. The Provider Co-Management Index (PCMI) was initially developed as a 20-item instrument across three theory-informed subscales. Objective This study aimed to establish construct validity of the PCMI with a sample of primary care providers through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants randomly selected from the IQVIA database across New York State. Mail surveys were used to acquire a minimum of 300 responses for split sample factor analyses. The first subsample (derivation sample) was used to explore factorial structure by conducting an exploratory factor analysis. A second (validation) sample was used to confirm the emerged factorial structure using confirmatory factor analysis. We performed iterative analysis and calculated good fit indices to determine the best-fit model. Results There were 333 responses included in the analysis. Cronbach's alpha was high for a 3-item per dimension scale within a one-factor model. The instrument was named PCMI–9 to indicate the shorter version length. Discussion This study established the construct validity of an instrument that scales the co-management of patients by two providers. The final instrument includes 9 items on a single factor using a 4-point, Likert-type scale. Additional research is needed to establish discriminant validity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3