Minimally Invasive Robotic Versus Open Fluoroscopic-guided Spinal Instrumented Fusions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Minimally Invasive Robotic Versus Open Fluoroscopic-guided Spinal Instrumented Fusions

Published:2017-03-15 Issue:6 Volume:42 Page:353-358
ISSN:0362-2436
Container-title:Spine
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Hyun Seung-Jae,Kim Ki-Jeong,Jahng Tae-Ahn,Kim Hyun-Jib

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion;Foley;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2003

2. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion;Ntoukas;Minim Invasive Neurosurg,2010

3. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach;Park;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007

4. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life;Adogwa;J Spinal Disord Tech,2011

5. Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates;Wu;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2010

Cited by 204 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pedicle screw placement accuracy in robot-assisted versus image-guided freehand surgery of thoraco-lumbar spine (ROBARTHRODESE): study protocol for a single-centre randomized controlled trial;Trials;2024-02-03

2. Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar compression fractures;Medicine;2023-12-01

3. Advancements in Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery;Neurosurgery Clinics of North America;2023-12

4. Complications Have Not Improved With Newer Generation Robots;Global Spine Journal;2023-11-15

5. Learning curve of junior surgeons in robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: a comparative cohort study;European Spine Journal;2023-11-14