Can Baseline Disability Predict Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?

Author:

Passias Peter G.1ORCID,Joujon-Roche Rachel1,Mir Jamshaid M.1,Tretiakov Peter1,Dave Pooja1,Williamson Tyler K.1,Imbo Bailey1,Krol Oscar1,Schoenfeld Andrew J.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedics. NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective Cohort Study Objective. To assess if there is a threshold of baseline disability, beyond which the patient reported outcomes after surgical correction of ASD are adversely impacted?. Background. Patient reported outcomes vary after correction of adult spinal deformity, even when patients are optimally realigned. There is a paucity of literature examining the impact of baseline disability on patient reported outcomes in adult spinal deformity(ASD). Methods. Patients with baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) data were included. Disability was ranked according to BL ODI into quintiles: Q1 (lowest ODI score) to Q5 (highest ODI score). Adjusted logistic regression analyses evaluated the likelihood of reaching ≥1 MCID in SRS-22 Pain, SRS-22 Activity, and SF-36 PCS at 2Y across disability groups Q1–Q4 with respect to Q5. Sensitivity tests were performed, excluding patients with any “0” Schwab modifiers at BL. Results. Compared to patients in Q5, odds of reaching MCID in SRS-22-Pain at 2Y were significantly higher for those in Q1 (OR: 3.771), Q2 (OR: 3.006), and Q3 (OR: 2.897), all P<0.021. Similarly, compared to patients in Q5, odds of reaching MCID in SRS-22-Activity at 2Y were significantly higher for those in Q2 (OR: 3.454) and Q3 (OR: 2.801), both P<0.02. Lastly, compared to patients in Q5, odds of reaching MCID in SF-36-PCS at 2Y were significantly higher for patients in Q1 (OR: 5.350), Q2 (OR: 4.795) and Q3 (OR: 6.229), all P<0.004. Conclusions. This study found that patients presenting with moderate disability at BL (ODI<40) consistently surpassed HRQL outcomes as compared to those presenting with greater levels of disability. We propose that a baseline ODI of 40 represents a disability threshold within which operative intervention maximizes patient reported outcomes. Furthermore, delaying intervention until patients progress to severe disability, may limit benefits of surgical correction in ASD patients. Level of Evidence. III

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3