“No-Touch” Left Approach for Recipient Hepatectomy: A Promising Strategy to Minimize Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in Liver Transplantation

Author:

Yang Shiwei1,Rong Guanghua2ORCID,Tan Haidong1,Liu Xiaolei1,Si Shuang1,Zhou Ruiquan1,Wang Haotong1,Zhu Jiqiao3,Li Xianliang3,He Qiang3,Han Dongdong1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplant Center, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

2. Department of Cancer Biotherapy, the Fifth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Background. Managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents significant clinical challenges, often necessitating orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). To mitigate the risk of iatrogenic metastasis during OLT and reduce posttransplantation recurrence (PTR), we introduced the “no-touch” left (NTL) approach for recipient hepatectomy in OLT. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, our aim was to compare the safety and PTR rates in patients undergoing OLT via either the NTL technique or the conventional approach for recipient hepatectomy. We included 106 patients who met the Hangzhou criteria and exhibited a high tumor burden in the right lobe, with 50 patients assigned to the NTL group and 56 to the conventional group. The primary endpoint was the 1-y PTR rate, whereas secondary endpoints encompassed the safety of the NTL approach, PTR rates at 2 and 5 y, and overall survival. Results. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. The NTL approach exhibited major surgical outcomes similar to those of the conventional approach. The cumulative PTR rates at 1, 2, and 5 y were 14.0% in the NTL group, compared with 24.5%, 35.8%, and 35.8% in the conventional group (P = 0.013). Cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 y were 94.0%, 91.9%, and 89.7% in the NTL group and 88.7%, 75.5%, and 72.5% in the conventional group (P = 0.03). Conclusions. This innovative surgical technique enhances safety and significantly reduces the risk of PTR, leading to improved long-term survival. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate our findings and establish the NTL approach as a standard practice in OLT.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference21 articles.

1. Surgical technique of orthotopic liver transplantation.;Makowka;Gastroenterol Clin North Am,1988

2. Preservation of the retrohepatic vena cava during recipient hepatectomy for orthotopic transplantation of the liver.;Stieber;Surg Gynecol Obstet,1989

3. Anterior approach for major right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma.;Liu;Ann Surg,2000

4. Anterior vs conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.;Tang;World J Gastroenterol,2017

5. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Hangzhou experiences.;Zheng;Transplantation,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3