Comparing the EORTC QLQ-LC13, EORTC QLQ-LC29, and the FACT-L for assessment of quality of life in patients with lung cancer - an updated systematic review

Author:

Hircock Caroline1,Wang Alyssa J.2,Goonaratne Ethan3,Sferrazza Dominic4,Bottomley Andrew5,Cella David6,Lee Shing Fung7,Chan Adrian W.2,Chow Edward2,Wong Henry C.Y.8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Upper Canada College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. St Michael College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Bottomley Consulting Group, Brussels, Belgium

6. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA

7. Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore

8. Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong, SAR, China

Abstract

Purpose of review Two commonly used quality of life (QoL) questionnaires in lung cancer patients are the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L). More recently, the EORTC QLQ-LC29 was developed. This systematic review compares the EORTC QLQ-LC29, EORTC QLQ-LC13 and FACT-L in terms of the content, validity and psychometric properties in assessing the QoL of lung cancer patients. Recent findings Fourteen studies were included. The EORTC QLQ-LC29 is a 29-item scale that serves as an update of the EORTC QLQ-LC13 to include symptoms from surgery and new targeted therapies. It shows validity, high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity. The FACT-L continues to assess general quality of life and lung cancer-specific symptoms. Summary The EORTC QLQ-LC29, EORTC QLQ-LC13, and FACT-L were reviewed to assess their validity in measuring QoL of lung cancer patients. All were found to be sufficiently validated, The choice of which to use should depend on the primary goals of the study.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference27 articles.

1. Cancer progress and priorities: lung cancer;Schabath;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2019

2. Quality of life in brain metastases radiation trials: a literature review;Wong;Curr Oncol,2008

3. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on;Post;Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil,2014

4. Comparison of the EORTC QLQ-LC13 and the FACT-L for assessment of quality of life in patients with lung cancer;DiGiovanni;J Pain Manag,2015

5. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument;Cella;Lung Cancer,1995

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3