Electrocardiographic Gating and Cerebral Perfusion Computed Tomography Option-Set Prevalence and Utilization Data From 62 Institutions in the United States

Author:

Rose Sean D.1,Lubner Meghan G.2,Heil John3,Greenwood Gina M.2,Szczykutowicz Timothy P.

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX

2. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI

3. Imalogix Research Institute, Bryn Mawr, PA

Abstract

Objectives To provide the radiology community with data to address the question: “Compared with peer institutions, is my institution efficiently using its electrocardiographic (ECG) gating and cerebral perfusion-capable computed tomography (CT) scanners?” Methods In this retrospective study, we analyze 6 months of scanner utilization data from 62 institutions (299 locations, 507 scanners) to identify scanners capable of performing ECG gating and perfusion CT studies. We report the number of ECG gating/perfusion–capable scanners and locations as a function of the total number of locations and scanners in each institution. We additionally regress the number of ECG-gated and perfusion examinations on (1) the number of locations/scanners capable of performing these examinations and (2) the fraction of the institution's CT examination volume that requires ECG gating or perfusion. We provide look-up tables so an institution can compare its ECG-gated/perfusion examination volume to other institutions with similar ECG-gated/perfusion examination fractions and capable scanners. Results We detected an effect of both ECG-gating examination fraction and the number of ECG gating–capable scanners on ECG-gated examination volume (χ 2 1 = 77.5 [P < 0.001] and χ 2 1 = 64.2 [P < 0.001], respectively). Similar results were obtained for perfusion examination fraction and perfusion-capable scanners as they relate to perfusion examination volume (χ 2 1 = 51.6 [P < 0.001] and χ 2 1 = 45.2 [P < 0.001], respectively). The number of ECG gating/perfusion–capable scanners and locations within an institution were found to positively correlate with both the total number of locations and scanners within an institution (P < 0.001 for all hypothesis tests). Conclusions The study provides multi-institutional data on ECG gating and perfusion examination volumes that can be used to inform CT purchasing decisions.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3