Interventions to Reduce Hospital and Emergency Department Utilization Among People With Alcohol and Substance Use Disorders

Author:

Gardner Rebekah L.12,Baier Rosa R.34,Cooper Emily L.2,Clements Erin E.5,Belanger Emmanuelle46

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University

2. Healthcentric Advisors

3. Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation

4. Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI

5. Public Health Program, Brown University School of Public Health

6. Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs), prevalent worldwide, are associated with significant morbidity and health care utilization. Objectives: To identify interventions addressing hospital and emergency department utilization among people with substance use, to summarize findings for those seeking to implement such interventions, and to articulate gaps that can be addressed by future research. Research Design: A scoping review of the literature. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar for any articles published from January 2010 to June 2020. The main search terms included the target population of adults with substance use or SUDs, the outcomes of hospital and emergency department utilization, and interventions aimed at improving these outcomes in the target population. Subjects: Adults with substance use or SUDs, including alcohol use. Measures: Hospital and emergency department utilization. Results: Our initial search identified 1807 titles, from which 44 articles were included in the review. Most interventions were implemented in the United States (n=35). Half focused on people using any substance (n=22) and a quarter on opioids (n=12). The tested approaches varied and included postdischarge services, medications, legislation, and counseling, among others. The majority of study designs were retrospective cohort studies (n=31). Conclusions: Overall, we found few studies assessing interventions to reduce health care utilization among people with SUDs. The studies that we did identify differed across multiple domains and included few randomized trials. Study heterogeneity limits our ability to compare interventions or to recommend one specific approach to reducing health care utilization among this high-risk population.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3